Read PDF White Backlash and the Politics of Multiculturalism

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online White Backlash and the Politics of Multiculturalism file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with White Backlash and the Politics of Multiculturalism book. Happy reading White Backlash and the Politics of Multiculturalism Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF White Backlash and the Politics of Multiculturalism at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF White Backlash and the Politics of Multiculturalism Pocket Guide.

I am concerned about the potential economic blowback, and I understand the need to have immigrants do the jobs Americans are unwilling to do, particularly in agriculture. Riskiness is the issue where I have the most difficulty with Trump. If you were going to convince me to not donate money to Trump, it would be on this point.

Part of me thinks that we'd be mostly fine, because presidents do not have a ton of influence on the economy in the first place, our economy doesn't seem tied up in any one sector that could be particularly prone to collapse; U. My biggest concern is if Trump tries to write off part of the debt. At this time we cannot have a balanced budget, but that's ok! Having a national deficit when you're the U.

Finally, I feel that white supremacists and anti-Semites are a tiny faction that shouldn't be a reason to dismiss Trump's speech of empowerment. But white supremacy and anti-Semitism is not the answer for most Trump supporters. Personally, I think that people need to be able to say these statements, even if they are hurtful. What must be done, though, is a dialogue, where ideas are put to the test, where people have the opportunity to hear and reject truly disastrous ideologies.

Book review : White Backlash and the Politics of Multiculturalism, by Roger Hewitt.

Look who PC culture does empower. I think she is just as hateful as white supremacists, but she is celebrated by Google. I don't think Google would celebrate a white separatist with a fun drawing and a place of honor on its front page! I have a problem that it celebrated someone who denounces America, but I'm willing to debate why she should have no place of honor instead of just denouncing Google. I do have some worries about Trump. I really do. If I lived in Ohio or a swing state, I might even be more worried.


  • Cutting Edge Internal Auditing.
  • The upgraders guide to Microsoft Office System 2003.
  • Low-Power CMOS Digital Pixel Imagers for High-Speed Uncooled PbSe IR Applications;

But I see this overwhelming PC culture, especially online. I get frustrated by the dialogue of letting immigrants into the country without control, letting Black Lives Matter protest without consequence, watching qualified Asian and White students lose places in universities and companies in the name of diversity. I worry about how companies are taking on the rallying cries of these causes, particularly the monopolies that Google and Facebook have. This may be something of me being 22 and feeling that we have time and can take risks.

With Hillary Clinton, we have a stable America, sure, but one where we have to police what we say in fear of being fired by an overly liberal manager. With Trump maybe we can restore some sanity to this country and fight back against this PC craze. Friedersdorf: I'm intrigued that you voted libertarian in , would sign up for a Gary Johnson presidency in if you thought it was a realistic electoral possibility, but also describe yourself as "slightly more authoritarian than the average person.

Trump Voter: I have supported the Libertarian party specifically for the policies military non-intervention, ending war on drugs, low taxes, etc. That said, I do not identify with the libertarian preference for a weak federal government. My ideal government would be strong enough to take on massive projects such as the illegal immigration question only when necessary, would prevent mass exploitation by the elites conservationist efforts to protect the environment, for example, but would try not to regulate people's personal and economic lives. The authoritarian aspect comes from the fact that I think we have a lot of issues that need to be fixed.

An authoritarian president needs to be able to initiate major policies that may go against party and elite orthodoxies, and I don't want some senator speaking for hours to prevent needed policies. If something needs to be done, it cannot be stalled by senators whose only interest is serving the elites. Friedersdorf: On immigration, set aside whether illegal immigrants "deserve" to be deported in some moral sense—maybe we can return to that question. For now, it seems to me that you're not thinking through what it would mean, practically, to deport 12 million people, or even a sizable fraction.

New York City has a population of 8. To police the city requires 34, uniformed officers patrolling the streets and 51, NYPD employees overall, despite the fact that most of those 8. You're talking about identifying, arresting, and deporting 12 million people, most of them in cities where the local police forces are not only already overburdened with existing duties, but controlled by city councils—and beyond that, voters—who will forbid them from assisting any mass deportation.

So you're talking about dispatching federal law enforcement, all of whom already have their own duties. How many new federal employees will have to be hired and trained? How will they identify the illegal immigrants? After all, Americans aren't required to carry their papers on the streets. Will that be required now? That racial profiling would be illegal. There would be massive street protests in opposition to this effort; significant civil disobedience; significantly less cooperation between illegal immigrants and their family members with the police and other government authorities on unrelated matters; and a massive new unionized workforce of federal law enforcement.

How efficient and competent and respectful of peoples right's you think folks who take that job are going to be? If by some miracle they achieve anything resembling success, do you think the new police force just goes away, melting back into unemployment?

Heinrich-Böll-Stiftungen in Bundesländern

For those reasons and more, it seems obvious to me that mass deportations would prove a logistical and civil-liberties disaster, one that would do more to divide the country and spark riots and violence than anything since the Vietnam War. Can you give me a realistic version of how it might play out differently? Trump Voter: Rounding up 12 million is going to rely on a strategy of both new policies to ensure the illegals do not want to stay, and a new force to ensure that those who do remain are rounded up.

For personal maids or gardeners even, you would need to go through a service to hire them to ensure you are hiring people that can legally be here. To open, or to keep, your bank account, you must show that you are legally able to stay in the United States or do business here. Schools can no longer protect their students and their illegal identity: In fact, schools will no longer be able to take any student who cannot prove they are here legally. Illegal immigrants will no longer be able to send ill gotten gains to Mexico, and the Mexican government will be forced to take a more active role in preventing immigrants from going into the United States.

If you are born to two illegal immigrants, you will not be given U. If you are born to people here temporarily, you will not be given U. In terms of rounding up those who do remain, you can give local police additional resources in terms of money and manpower.

Donald Trump and the Backlash Against Political Correctness - The Atlantic

If they're already overwhelmed, then they could use the new officers even after the immigration problem is finished or at least reduced. I do see the need to prevent the rise of an SS sort of force, so you could try using the military to assist, especially those trained as MPs, or various private-security contractors that would not be unionized and could be disbanded after the crisis and find new employment. But this would mostly be to process the illegals and send them back to Mexico or other Central American states, and less about checking individual American ID cards.

Do you feel the policies I listed would be able to significantly dent the illegal immigration problem?

Beyond diversity: Challenging racism in an age of backlash

If not, what would you feel be the best solution to illegal immigration? Friedersdorf: I believe that the best solution is to aggressively deport people who've perpetrated serious crimes and to grant legal residency to everyone else, so long as the folks who snuck across the border or overstayed visas as adults pay a small fine into a fund used to expedite the processing of folks waiting in line to come here legally.

Main navigation

Like the amnesty, this would get a whole lot of people who live here operating inside the system. And it would avoid destroying the lives of countless people with deportations that needlessly separate families, lovers, friends, and acquaintances. If a border wall would make this more politically palatable, that's fine.


  • A Dialogue With a 22-Year-Old Donald Trump Supporter!
  • White Backlash and the Politics of Multiculturalism - Roger Hewitt - Google книги.
  • Epigenetic Gene Expression and Regulation.
  • Dæmonomania (Ægypt, Book 3)?
  • Will be the year of white backlash in Canada? | olagynulehyb.gq?

I dislike the symbolism of a wall, but the status quo, where we have large swaths of a wall, death-trap gaps in parts of the desert that are particularly dangerous to cross, and armed guards on patrol, many of them corrupt, isn't exactly a symbol of welcome! It may have more costs than a barrier that decreased instances of agents and migrants meeting.

There's simply no reason for people with good lives in a country like America to take such a big risk on a wild card like Trump. That doesn't alarm me. But I see him empowering folks who are much farther right than any view you've expressed: white supremacists and anti-Semites who already seem emboldened by his rise. I could sketch out some additional reasons, but that's a lot to chew on already. Are you persuaded by any of those concerns? If not, what do you think I have wrong about Trump?

Trump Voter: I'd also sign up for a Gary Johnson presidency. Unfortunately, the world we live in does not make that possibility likely.


  1. Multiculturalism;
  2. Inborn Metabolic Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment!
  3. Product description!
  4. To answer your questions! Maybe this comes from being in the white group, but I never saw Trump as race-baiting. I don't have a problem necessarily with Mexicans who come here legally, obey our laws, and eventually learn to speak English. I do have a problem with those who look at our immigration laws and say, "Nah, I'd rather not obey those. As for Muslim Americans, I think they have so far been very cooperative with counter-terror efforts, and Trump's policies do not target them.

    Trump is targeting those who live outside of the U. Race is something in general that I see Trump losing people on. But I think that Trump, messaging problems aside, wants any race to be successful in America, be it black, white, Latino, or Asian. I do not want a Trump presidency to turn into a racist administration.

    Non-PC, non-affirmative action is great, but actual discrimination? I agree with your fears for the free press. Whether Trump would or would not do it, using libel laws to shut down media outlets could be misused, by him or a successor. Even if I trend slightly more authoritarian than average, I don't want to live in a dictatorship.

    Killing terrorist family members has been something I've wondered about for a long time. While the idea seems horrible initially, sometimes when you have these attacks, you wonder what can we do to stop them? If we knew that this policy would stop terrorist attacks, would we go down that road? It's a worrying thing to wonder for one's soul. In any case, Trump seems to have disregarded the idea, which I think shows that he can shy away from his most authoritarian ideas, but also that he's willing to discuss ideas that would be instantly dismissed otherwise. His intention to round up 12 million illegal immigrants does not bother me; these people are criminals, are they not?

    They illegally entered or overstayed their visas. And who says they need to be federal agents? Local police could absolutely do the job. I don't know whether or not you reside in a sanctuary city, but San Francisco prohibits cops from working with immigration enforcement, even with criminals.

    Product details

    Why should people who should not be here be allowed to stay after committing another crime? I am concerned about the potential economic blowback, and I understand the need to have immigrants do the jobs Americans are unwilling to do, particularly in agriculture. Riskiness is the issue where I have the most difficulty with Trump.

    If you were going to convince me to not donate money to Trump, it would be on this point. Part of me thinks that we'd be mostly fine, because presidents do not have a ton of influence on the economy in the first place, our economy doesn't seem tied up in any one sector that could be particularly prone to collapse; U. My biggest concern is if Trump tries to write off part of the debt. At this time we cannot have a balanced budget, but that's ok! Having a national deficit when you're the U. Finally, I feel that white supremacists and anti-Semites are a tiny faction that shouldn't be a reason to dismiss Trump's speech of empowerment.

    But white supremacy and anti-Semitism is not the answer for most Trump supporters. Personally, I think that people need to be able to say these statements, even if they are hurtful. What must be done, though, is a dialogue, where ideas are put to the test, where people have the opportunity to hear and reject truly disastrous ideologies. Look who PC culture does empower. I think she is just as hateful as white supremacists, but she is celebrated by Google.

    I don't think Google would celebrate a white separatist with a fun drawing and a place of honor on its front page! I have a problem that it celebrated someone who denounces America, but I'm willing to debate why she should have no place of honor instead of just denouncing Google. I do have some worries about Trump. I really do. If I lived in Ohio or a swing state, I might even be more worried. But I see this overwhelming PC culture, especially online.

    I get frustrated by the dialogue of letting immigrants into the country without control, letting Black Lives Matter protest without consequence, watching qualified Asian and White students lose places in universities and companies in the name of diversity. I worry about how companies are taking on the rallying cries of these causes, particularly the monopolies that Google and Facebook have.

    This may be something of me being 22 and feeling that we have time and can take risks. With Hillary Clinton, we have a stable America, sure, but one where we have to police what we say in fear of being fired by an overly liberal manager. With Trump maybe we can restore some sanity to this country and fight back against this PC craze. Friedersdorf: I'm intrigued that you voted libertarian in , would sign up for a Gary Johnson presidency in if you thought it was a realistic electoral possibility, but also describe yourself as "slightly more authoritarian than the average person.

    Trump Voter: I have supported the Libertarian party specifically for the policies military non-intervention, ending war on drugs, low taxes, etc. That said, I do not identify with the libertarian preference for a weak federal government. My ideal government would be strong enough to take on massive projects such as the illegal immigration question only when necessary, would prevent mass exploitation by the elites conservationist efforts to protect the environment, for example, but would try not to regulate people's personal and economic lives.

    The authoritarian aspect comes from the fact that I think we have a lot of issues that need to be fixed. An authoritarian president needs to be able to initiate major policies that may go against party and elite orthodoxies, and I don't want some senator speaking for hours to prevent needed policies. If something needs to be done, it cannot be stalled by senators whose only interest is serving the elites. Friedersdorf: On immigration, set aside whether illegal immigrants "deserve" to be deported in some moral sense—maybe we can return to that question.

    For now, it seems to me that you're not thinking through what it would mean, practically, to deport 12 million people, or even a sizable fraction. New York City has a population of 8. Narrative counternarrative and the boundaries. Backlash multicultural politics and the global turbine. Select bibliography.

    Politics and backlash on the large stage.