Indeed, not only are salaried partners found in most firms now but their numbers are growing signifi- cantly. As suggested by Table 1, salaried partners are, in our sample, the fastest, indeed the only, growing section of the professional labour force. Thus, salaried partnership, from an anomaly found only in a minority of firms, has been recast as a formal step in an increasingly elongated profes- sional career structure. This introduction of new steps in the career ladder together with the broadening of existing ones has implied the elongation of hierarchies and the stretching of career spans.
Writing in the s, Richard Abel estimated an average wait of 5. A salaried solicitor can gener- ate substantially more fees than her labour costs this surplus can oscillate between 2. Indeed, according to Hanlon,42 large firms have operationalised this logic by considering for partnership only those solicitors who generate three times more income than their remuneration costs.
The rule of the game is simple: increase the number of people who bake the cake whilst stabilising or reducing the number of people who can share the cake. Salaried partnership contributes to this strategy by increasing leverage whilst providing at the same time an expectation management tool. The financial logic associated with these developments emerges clearly in Table 2. In this context, the manipulation of staffing ratios becomes an effective route for increasing profitability and a standard aspect of law firm management.
Most radically, recent interventions have also sought the reduction of equity partner headcount in a period of boom for legal services. Although a proportion of this reduction will be accounted for by natural wastage, these trends corroborate growing anecdotal evidence of de-equitisation redun- dancy of equity partners. According to some44 this strikes at the heart of the very nature of the legal profession, as, in a dramatic break with the past, it signifies how partners, the owners of the firms, are also increasingly viewed as cost to be efficiently and ruthlessly managed.
Thus, the updated strategy may be to actually reduce rather than simply stabilise those who share the cake, whilst of course continuing to expand those who participate to revenue generation. Financialisation by Proxy 49 was a period between and of unprecedented growth and profitability. Thus, the grow- ing attention for financialised metrics and practices and the unprecedented impact that these are having on the structure of the legal profession is cer- tainly tied to the self-interested agency of those who stand to benefit from these changes: equity partners.
Yet, there are other significant vectors of change beyond self-interest. It is to these other vectors of financialisation that we now turn our attention. This created new competition and, most significantly for our argument here, positioned English incumbents against competitors with significantly higher levels of profits. This had two effects. First, it created reputational problems for English firms. Law firms live and die on their reputations and, in a financialised world where profitabil- ity is the only accepted measure of success and the quality of the firm, being less profitable than your US counterpart causes reputational problems.
Second, and more pragmatically, the more profitable US firms were able to pay solicitors significantly more money and, therefore, poach star players from English firms. For example potential recruits may regard them as significant. Perhaps some clients make a judgment on the quality of a law firm by how well it seems to be doing in those terms. And undoubtedly this is true to some extent as English firms copied their rivals who had begun to leverage higher numbers of solicitors to partners, used up-or-out promotion mechanisms,51 deployed dual-tier partnership arrangements and crucially enjoyed better profitability levels at an earlier stage.
This Act, through the introduction of Alternative Business Structures, paves the way for the potential overhaul of the traditional governance, regulation and structure of legal practice. A key provision, here, is the acceptance of outside meaning non-lawyer ownership of law firms. Indeed, part of the logic of the new financial metrics such as PEP is to provide an acceptable basis for the valuation of law firms so as to facilitate investment decisions.
Large corporate law firms now service clients that are constantly merging, de-merging, reorganising and refinancing their operations. Law firms have become so embroiled in the logics and practices of financialised management on behalf of their clients that they have begun to absorb and recreate these in a process of institutional isomorphism. Cultural Economy and Law Firm Management As described in the opening sections of the chapter, various agents of financialisation have an important role in reproducing the discourses that influence corporate actors. In particular, management gurus and consultan- cies have in recent years increasingly turned their attention to advising law firms.
Perhaps the most important guru for law firms is David Maister. In them Maister offers various prescriptions for managing everything from partner motiva- tion to overseas office networks. Significantly, profitability is a key issue in all of these texts. In Managing the Professional Service Firm a whole chapter is dedicated to this issue early on in the book. Here readers are reminded that: In a partnership, the ultimate measure of profitability is or should be profit per partner, which is driven by three main factors, margin, productivity, and leverage 56 Froud et al, Financialization and Strategy n 3.
The media also deserves careful consideration because of the central role some publications have played in championing financial logics. Mirroring the findings of Gordon Clark, Nigel Thrift and Adam Tickell,65 and Greenfield and Williams,66 it seems that the way the media portrays certain types of action has helped sway the behaviour of managing partners in law firms.
Winning an award from the FT or being top of the PEPs in tables produced by The Lawyer and others is seen as important proxy for quality and performance and as such a concern for management. These issues form the focus of the discussion below. As we show, the changes law firms have initiated have both intended and unintended consequences worth further examination. Professional Lives: Towards the Law Factory? As reported, recent changes have involved the elongation and formalisa- tion of professional hierarchies and the emergence of two-tier partnerships with associate lawyers being asked to wait longer before they are offered partnership.
Perhaps one of the most justifiable logics connected with the prolifera- tion of salaried partners is, then, its role in managing career expectations and combating attrition by offering associates who otherwise would not be promoted the title and status of being a partner. However, paradoxically, despite the intention to provide an expectation management tool, frustra- tion is often caused by the fact that on many occasions the profit generating threshold for admittance to any form of partnership places substantial— some might say unreasonable—demands on lawyers.
Consequently, as the income gap separating junior solicitors and partners from their profit-sharing equity partner seniors widens,73 and as promotion tracks become more competitive and tortuous, workloads increase, work—life balance deteriorates and promotion tournaments become more fractious. Sixteen hour days and six or seven day working weeks are now not uncom- mon as lawyers strive for promotion and are leveraged to deliver rises in PEP.
These tensions of course reap a personal as well as a professional toll. In particular, the combination of extended partnership tracks and growing stress levels are said to be the cause of the now significant attrition rates experienced by large English firms,74 despite unprecedented financial suc- cess.
You cannot ask associates to do much more than they are doing. Results of about 8. Your list has reached the maximum number of items. Please create a new list with a new name; move some items to a new or existing list; or delete some items. Lawyers, the State and the Market Professionalism Revisited. Print book. Gerard Hanlon. Lawyers, the State and the Market: Professionalism Revisited. Publisher: Oxford [Oxfordshire] : M. Robertson, What generates the demand for lawyers?
Why do they seem so much more numerous and prominent in some societies than others—the United States and Japan usually being represented as the extremes. What is their impact on the economy? Do they enhance productivity and facilitate exchange as Willard Hurst argued nearly half a century ago? Or are they parasites, not just unproductive but actually a drag on the economy? An extreme and poorly substantiated case for the latter view a classic "big lie" popularized by Dan Quayle has prompted a barrage of criticism, which may have the desirable effect of stimulating more sophisticated economic analysis of the profession, .
Although many of these theoretical controversies were joined after the initial publication of the empirical data presented in the following. Indeed, such comparison is indispensable. Furthermore, these debates point to the kinds of additional information necessary to test the theories. I hope readers will be encouraged to formulate their own theoretical frameworks for understanding the legal profession, test them against the accounts presented here, and be provoked to conduct the research suggested by lacunae and ambiguities.
I offered a critical synopsis of Larson, in a review essay, Abel, See Sterett, ; Sugar-man, Nevertheless, capitalism vastly expands and utterly transforms the market for lawyers' services. Most do not start earning any money for themselves until they have worked seven hours. More than 90 percent are foreign-born. Dangerous driving has emerged as the leading consumer complaint, up percent from to Fragin, Public lecturing failed to professionalize in the nineteenth century Scott, , yet some people today make an excellent living giving lectures or hosting or appearing on radio and television talk shows.
The reference to Tijuana recalls the era when Mexico offered quick divorces to Americans unable to obtain them at home because of the fault requirement. American corporations have deliberately reduced the number of law firms they use in order to increase their leverage in fee negotiations. New York Times. Germany long has had far more widespread legal expense insurance. Legal need studies have been conducted in many other countries, including the United States, the Netherlands, Canada, and Australia. July 9, A Virginia lawyer, angered by the Miller ad, wrote, produced, and paid to run a spoof in which a cowgirl lassos "Philip Millerd" a play on Philip Morris, Miller's parent company and condemns him for the health effects of cigarettes.
New York Times B12, January 21, On the role of elite bar associations in elevating status, see Powell, On the tortuous path to collective action, see Halliday et al. Kritzer a urges that professions be compared in terms of relative institutionalization, a concept that appears to combine social structural and cognitive variables. Auerbach suggests that Jewish preoccupation with religious law is related to Jewish overrepresentation among secular lawyers.
Berends both urges such studies and has conducted them, but unfortunately they are available only in Dutch. Abbott, cites both of these but also makes strong claims for the novelty of his own schema. For a critique of lawyer self-regulation, see Wilkins, Local legal professions within federal polities have sometimes engaged in similar competition. Nelson and Trubek b offer legal services as evidence of professionalism; once again, however, fewer than one percent of American lawyers provide legal services, and they are paid by the state, not the profession.
Freidson leaves this ambiguity unresolved. On the possibility of a "universal class," see Derber et al. On the role of lawyers in helping clients evade law, see McBarnet, , , a , b , New York Times C1, September 29, The Inner Circle of Advocates, founded for the same purpose twenty years ago, has preserved its exclusivity through a humerus clausus of New York Times B18, May 6, Trade Representative Mickey Kantor boasted that the Clinton Administration abandoned the Reagan and Bush Administration's policy of aggressively promoting American tobacco exports.
When asked how he reconciled this with his own representation in private practice of the Beverly Hills Restaurant Association in its fight against an anti-smoking ordinance, he replied: "I see no contradiction in that and I'm not defensive about it at all. Obviously when you're a lawyer in a corporate practice, in Gordon and Simon find solace in Rosen's a claim that some house counsel restrain clients.
The dilemma of the good lawyer in a bad role is a staple of media presentations, see Chase, ; Post, ; Rosen, b. Myers, who was fired for refusing to draft and enforce an ordinance criminalizing homelessness, see Fulton, His replacement, Marsha Jones Moutrie, announced: "1 come in the door with no particular substantive agenda. I intend to work hard at being a very good lawyer for the city. Does he really mean to hold up the concordat between the Papacy and the Italian state as something to be emulated? For some recent accounts, see Chambers, ; Drachman, , ; Eaves et al.
A recent survey by the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles respondents out of members found that three out of five believed women received less desirable work than did men and three out of four felt that women were held to higher standards. Daniels , offers a more complicated account, which I find more satisfactory; see also Nelson, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Abel, Richard L. Thomas, ed. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Abel and Philip S. Lewis, eds. Berkeley: University of California Press. The Legal Profession in England and Wales. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. New York: Plenum. American Bar Association, Commission on Professionalism. Chicago: ABA. Alfieri, Anthony V. Aron, Nan. Arthurs, Harry W. Auerbach, Jerold S. Baldwin, John, and Michael McConville. Negotiated Justice: Pressures to Plead Guilty.
London: Martin Robertson. Bancaud, Alain, and Anne Boigeol. Becher, Tony. Berends, Miek. Bishop, William. Blankenburg, Erhard. Brante, Thomas. Brint, Steven. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Bromwich, Michael, and Anthony Hopwood, eds. Accounting and the Law. Burrage, Michael. Burrage, Michael, and Rolf Torstendahl, eds. London: Sage.
Cain, Maureen, and Christine B. Harrington, eds. Lawyers in a Postmodern World: Translation and Transgression. Buckingham: Open University Press. Calhoun, Craig, and Martha Copp. Caplan, Lincoln. Carr, Jack, and Frank Mathewson. Chambers, David L. Clark, Andrew. Clark, Andrew, and Kim Economides.
Clark, R. Are They Good or Bad? Cocks, Geoffrey, and Konrad H. Jarausch, eds. German Professions, New York: Oxford University Press. Collins, Randall. Croft, Colin. Cross, Frank B. Daniels, Ronald J. Derber, Charles. Boston: G. Derber, Charles, William A. Schwartz, and Yale Magrass. Dezalay, Yves. Dezalay, Yves, and David Sugarman, eds. Professional Competition and the Social Construction of Markets. Dingwall, Robert. Domberger, Simon, and Avrom Sherr. Drachman, Virginia G. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Dzienkowski, John S. Eaves, David, I. Png, and J.
Mark Ramseyer. Eisler, Kim. New York: St. Martin's Press. Elkins, James R. Elzinga, Aant. Engel, David M. Epp, Charles R.
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. Women in Law , 2d ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Erlanger, Howard S. Felstiner, William L. E, and Austin Sarat. Flemming, Roy B. Flood, John. Flood, John, and Eleni Skordaki.
London: ACCA. Fox, Robert. Fragin, Sheryl, Freidson, Eliot. Fulton, William. Galanter, Marc, and Thomas Palay. Geison, Gerald L. Professions and the French State , Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Gelfand, Toby. Gellis, Ann. Gilson, Ronald J. Gilson, Ronald, and Robert Mnookin. Glendon, Mary Ann. Goldstein, Jan. Goodrich, Chris. Gordon, Robert W. Geison, ed. Gawalt, ed. Goriely, Tammy, and Elaine Kempson. New York: Routledge. Granfield, Robert, and Thomas Koenig. Greenberg, Jack. New York: Basic Books. Hagan, John. Klen and J.
Glass, eds. Hagan, John, and Fiona Kay. Haley, John Owen. Abel, ed.
The Law Society of Upper Canada Professionalism Revisited
New York: Academic Press. Halliday, Terence C. Powell, and Mark W. Lawyers and the Pursuit of Legal Rights. Harrington, Christine B. Hartmann, Michael. Heinz, John P, and Edward O. Evanston, Ill. Heinz, John P. Laumann, Robert L. Nelson, and Robert H. Cambridge, Mass. Hellberg, Inga. Heymann, Philip. Huskey, Eugene.
Princeton, N. Indiana Law Journal. Ingleby, Richard. Solicitors and Divorce. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Jamous, H. Jackson, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Johnsen, Jon T. Johnstone, Quintin, and Dan Hopson, Jr. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Kagan, Robert A.
Karpik, Lucien. Katsh, M. The Electronic Media and the Transformation of Law. Katz, Jack. Poor People's Lawyers in Transition. New Brunswick, N. Kelly, Michael. Lives of Lawyers : Journeys in the Organizations of Practice. Kessler, Mark. Westport, Conn. Konttinen, Esa.
Kressel, Kenneth. Kritzer, Herbert M. Let's Make a Deal. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Kronman, Anthony T. Kumble, Steven J. Landon, Donald. New York: Praeger. Larson, Magali Sarfatti. Lawrence, Susan. Ledford, Kenneth F Lee, R. Linowitz, Sol, with Martin Mayer. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. Lisagor, Nancy, and Frank Lipsius. New York: Morrow. Luban, David. Totowa, N. Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study.
Magee, Stephen P Magee, Stephen P. Brock, and Leslie Young. Mann, Kenneth. New Haven: Yale University Press. Mattesich, Paul, and Cheryl Heilman. McBarnet, Doreen. London: Macmillan. McBarnet, Doreen, and Christopher Whelan. McCahery, Joseph, and Sol Picciotto. McClelland, Charles E. Reflections on German Professionalization, ," in Torstendahl and Burrage, Oxford: Oxford University Press. McEwan, Craig A. McIntyre, Lisa J.
Miller, Peter, and Michael Power.
Lawyers, the state and the market : professionalism revisited - Ghent University Library
Munger, Frank. Murphy, Raymond. Murray, Georgina. Nelson, Robert. Partners with Power. Nelson, Robert L. Trubek, and Rayman L. Solomon, eds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Olson, Mancur. Osiel, Mark J. Paterson, Alan A. Post, Robert C. Powell, Michael. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Pue, W. Ramsey, Ian M. Reifner, Udo. Abel ed. Ripps, Stephen R. Roach, Sharon L. Rogowski, Ralf. Rosen, Robert. Rosen, Sherwin. Rosenthal, Douglas E. Lawyer and Client: Who's In Charge? Royal Commission on Legal Services.
Final Report. Salokar, Rebecca M. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Sander, Richard H. Douglass Williams. Sarat, Austin, and William L. E Felstiner. Scheingold, Stuart. Schneyer, Theodore. Schurr, Carolyn. Scott, Donald M. Seron, Carroll. Shamir, Ronen. Durham: Duke University Press. Shapiro, Martin. Shelley, Louise. Sherr, Avrom. Siegrist, Hannes. Simon, William H. Skordaki, Eleni, ed.
- Everybody Sees the Ants?
- Lawyers in Society.
- Lawyers, the state, and the market : professionalism revisited - Union College;
- Lawyers, the State and the Market.
Social Change and the Solicitors' Profession. Solomon, Rayman L. Stager, D. Stanford Law Review. Stephen, Frank H. Sterett, Susan. Stevens, Robert B. Stover, Robert V. Sugarman, David.
Svensson, Lennart G. Thomas, Philip A. Law in the Balance: Legal Services in the Eighties. Torstendahl, Rolf. Torstendahl, Roll, and Michael Burrage, eds. London: Sage Publications.