Guide From Present to Past and Back: Papers on Baltic and Slavic Accentology

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online From Present to Past and Back: Papers on Baltic and Slavic Accentology file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with From Present to Past and Back: Papers on Baltic and Slavic Accentology book. Happy reading From Present to Past and Back: Papers on Baltic and Slavic Accentology Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF From Present to Past and Back: Papers on Baltic and Slavic Accentology at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF From Present to Past and Back: Papers on Baltic and Slavic Accentology Pocket Guide.

Seller Inventory P Satisfaction Guaranteed! Book is in Used-Good condition. Pages and cover are clean and intact. Used items may not include supplementary materials such as CDs or access codes.


  1. Introduction by Marc L. Greenberg.
  2. New from Cambridge University Press!.
  3. From Present to Past and Back : Roman Sukac : .
  4. HASHLIVE EN MEDIO DE UNA BATALLA: ¡LA DE LAS DÉCADAS MUSICALES!.
  5. Retrospect and Prospect in the Psychological Study of Families.

May show signs of minor shelf wear and contain limited notes and highlighting. Ships with Tracking Number! May not contain Access Codes or Supplements. May be ex-library. Buy with confidence, excellent customer service!. Published by Frankfurt, M. About this Item: Frankfurt, M. Condition: Sehr gut.

انتشارات Peter Lang Ltd International Academic Publishers

Ein gutes und sauberes Exemplar. Published by Peter Lang Pub Inc Dust Jacket Condition: Neu.

Kundrecensioner

The session which followed in the series after the previous successful conference held in Copenhagen was dedicated to various aspects of Indo-European phonetics, phonemics, and morphophonemics. The papers dealt with questions relating to both the Indo-European protolanguage and specific branches of the Indo-European family.

From Present to Past and Back: Papers on Baltic and Slavic Accentology

Twenty-three papers of those presented at the conference appear in their revised version in this volume. The common denominator is historical linguistics, but some authors also extended their research into modern mor phonological theories. Being a selection of representative papers in Indo-European linguistics and following the tradition started in Copenhagen, the book will be valuable to all scholars interested in Indo-European linguistics.

Jasanoff Did Hittite have si- imperatives? Item added to your basket View basket. Proceed to Basket. View basket. Continue shopping. Results 1 - 27 of United Kingdom. Search Within These Results:. Bergisch Gladbach, Germany Seller Rating:. Galway, Ireland Seller Rating:. Seller Image. From present to past and back. Papers on Baltic and Slavic accentology. Potsdam linguistic investigations, Vol. BC — crystalization of the proto-Slavs in the southern periphery of the proto-Baltic continuum, localized from Silesia to Central Ukraine Trziniec-Komarov culture. Sapienti sat. The ethnocultural traits that define Slavs and Balts are all results of later development few paganic deities here and there aside , as opposed to e.

Indo-Iranian branch where Old Indic Vedic Sanskrit and Old Iranian Avestan documents speak of very long stage of shared common social and religious development. Linguistic evidence shows that there is no significant difference between the Proto-Baltic one can reconstruct on the basis of comparative Baltic evidence, and Proto-Balto-Slavic one can reconstruct on the basis of comparative Slavic and Baltic evidence - they refer to the same chronological sage. In fact, hundreds of Proto-Slavic words can be derived from Baltic by application of regular sound laws.

I can imagine that "Slavs descending from Balts" fits into some crazy nationalist scheme of yours, but that is far from truth, esp. I think you misinterpreted what I wrote. I stated that some of the apparently Baltic editors were implying that the proto-Balto-Slavic linguistic theorem is a Soviet era, pan-Slavist propaganda. I'm saying its not, but based on some good, objective evidence. Hxseek talk , 8 February UTC. As can be judged from available references, Baltic-Slavic is just a hypothetical IE language group, and the existence of proto-Balto-Slavic is a subject of ongoing debate.

Here I list my references once again:. Central European University Press, Chapter 2, p Accessible via Google Books. Mouton de Gruyter, See for example p. Just one citation:. Other vice, they deserve to be warned of original research [2]. When it comes to linguistics, I personally have no nationalistic agenda seeking to promote proto-Baltic intended to bypass proto-Balto-Slavic, denying common ancestry, etc. To the various points made above, I think we can agree that a simple redirect of proto-Baltic to the article here is not sufficient and leaves the article open to interpretations of pan-Slavism.

It is not necessary to call Lituanus a crackpot magazine. A Balto-Slavic protolanguage is untenable. The assessment that there was no singular " Proto " Baltic dialect appears to debunk a Balto-Slavic protolanguage. The "unconnected paganic tribes", with their allies, defeated the Papal Crusaders of Western Europe in and established Freedom of Religion in the Duchy of Lithuania. The archaeological record has hemp and wheat seeds in the Lithuanian area around 3, BCE and agriculture record intensifying in the centuries following.

Is Slavic at Pre-Komarov ethnic or multi-ethnic as perhaps Chernoles culture? E-mail: eugen. The diachronic relationship between the Baltic and the Slavic languages is one of the most intriguing puzzles of Indo-European linguistics. Although these groups of languages constitute two separate branches of Indo-European, they share an unusually high number of common innovations concerning the inflectional, derivational and accentual system. Despite many years of research, the reason for the striking similarity remains unclear.

There are two competing, although not mutually exclusive hypotheses. The other hypothesis seeks to explain the similarities within the framework of language contact, i. Both positions have been argued, but neither has been generally accepted. During the last few decades, international research has concentrated on particular grammatical features of Baltic and Slavic. Most of these studies while useful, however, focused on either Baltic or Slavic without taking into account the other language group.

The goal of the workshop therefore is to bring together scholars with expertise in Baltic and in Slavic and to find some new answers to the old question about the existence of a Balto-Slavic unity. Now, what did they say about Baltic and Slavic? Look up Andersen, H. Slavic and the Indo-European migrations. I think you better get busy with your "Modern interpretation" section. The whole chapter dedicated to those Ivanov-Toporov is ridiculous from any point. Someone templated the section Proto-Balto-Slavic language to be splitoff from the article? The answer should be: of course, go ahead!

The reasons are:. I support this proposal, but something on PBSl. I suggest that that be the list of basic isoglosses and a few sentences on shared accentual laws. The article now contains this claim I have split off the very lengthy discussion about the term "Serbo-Crotian" to a separate subpage so as to not clog this page with very large charts and tables. Please continue the discussion there. This action should not be construed as my involvement in the actual discussion or as support for any given side of the argument.

Folks, this kind of attitude [7] and I mean both summaries makes me sorry that I edit Wikipedia. I'm far from an expert on the Balto-Slavic languages, and not really a linguist, but from what I gathered from the literature, all I can say is that what is in the lede: " Baltic and Slavic languages share several linguistic traits not found in any other Indo-European branch, which points to the period of common development. However, there is an ongoing debate on the nature of that relationship: Some claim they were genetically related, and others explain similarities by prolonged language contact.

Now, can you work on improving the citations and hashing out the differences, rather than calling each other vandals? No such user talk , 10 June UTC. Kursis talk , 11 June UTC. So, I don't see anything substantial left from Kursis' original "vandalism" though I also highly disagree with your characterization of it For the last time, I will fix what I think should be fixed according to the analysis above, and remove this stuff from my watchlist so that you can have it your way.

I will also spare you moral sermons in the future, except for the last one: you are knowledgeable in this stuff, and it's too bad that you're such a jerk. No such user talk , 30 July UTC. When users, such Kursis, make claims of pan-Slavism against well intentioned and well informed editors, they only unmask their own bias. Whichever way one looks at it, Baltic and SLavic formed a late PIE macrodialectical group that partially disintegrated but still underwent a highly significant number of common innovations Hxseek talk , 4 November UTC.

Rekonstruktion und relative Chronologie: Akten der 8. The Greek 3rd pl. Remarks on Winter's law. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics Dutch contributions to the 10th international congress of slavists: Linguistics , The Thraco-Armenian consonant shift. Proto-Germanic obstruents. Nieuw licht op de Germaanse klankverschuivingen. Van Wijk's Altpreussische Studien revisited. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 12 [Gs. The making of a puzzle.

Annual of Armenian Linguistics 10 , The Germanic third class of weak verbs. North-Western European Language Evolution 15 , On methods of dealing with facts and opinions in a treatment of the progressive palatalization of Slavic. Der polabische Wortakzent. Polabian accentuation World Wide Web [pdf], The accentuation of neuter nouns in Slovene and West Bulgarian.

Rigler] , The Germanic weak preterit. The Germanic weak preterit World Wide Web [pdf], The spread of the Indo-Europeans. Journal of Indo-European Studies 18 , Eight Indo-Uralic verbs? Vosem' indo-ural'skix glagolov? Voprosy Jazykoznanija 1, On the meaning of the Japanese passive.

Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 24 , On the meaning of the Japanese passive World Wide Web [pdf], The fate of the sigmatic aorist in Tocharian. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies , suppl. The Germanic seventh class of strong verbs. North-Western European Language Evolution 18 , Annual of Armenian Linguistics 12 , The Old Norse i -umlaut.

Slavic linguistics in the new millennium

North-Western European Language Evolution 20 , A note on the Tocharian dual. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies 5 , Kluge's law and the rise of Proto-Germanic geminates. The Germanic fifth class of strong verbs. North-Western European Language Evolution 19 , The Germanic sixth class of strong verbs. North-Western European Language Evolution 23 , Old High German umlaut. On breaking. North-Western European Language Evolution 24 , The origin of the Japanese and Korean accent systems. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 26 , Transeurasian linguistics , vol.

II: Phonology London: Routledge, , Proto-Armenian numerals. Annual of Armenian Linguistics 14 , The Proto-Germanic pluperfect. Absolute and conjunct again. General linguistics and Indo-European reconstruction. Rask 2 , The accentual system of the Freising manuscripts. Linguistica Baltica 3 , Palatalization of dentals in Armenian. Annual of Armenian Linguistics 15 , On the accent marks in the First Freising Fragment.

The Germanic fourth class of weak verbs. North-Western European Language Evolution 25 , Lithuanian verbs in -auti and -uoti. Linguistica Baltica 4 [Gs. The sigmatic forms of the Armenian verb. Annual of Armenian Linguistics 16 , The High German consonant shift.

Navigation menu

The Proto-Armenian verbal system. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Armenian linguistics Delmar, N. The development of the Prussian language in the 16th century. The development of the Prussian language in the 16th century World Wide Web [pdf], Festschrift for Eric P. Hamp , vol. How old is the English glottal stop? Labials, velars and labiovelars in Germanic. North-Western European Language Evolution 30 , The dual endings of the Indo-European verb. Studia Indogermanica Lodziensia 2 , Review of: Chr. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 17 , Annual of Armenian Linguistics 17 , The Tocharian imperfect.

Thematic and athematic verb forms in Old Irish. Sound law and analogy: Papers in honor of Robert S. Beekes on the occasion of his 60th birthday Amsterdam: Rodopi, , The Prussian Catechismus I. The Prussian Catechismus II. The Prussian Enchiridion. Two Old Prussian fragments.

Are Mongolian and Tungus genetically related?

Roman Sukac (Author of Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and Balto-Slavic Accentology)

Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 51 , International Journal of Central Asian Studies 3 , World Wide Web [pdf], Old Irish ol 'inquit'. Syntax and semantics in the history of Chinese. The Journal of Intercultural Studies [Osaka] 25 , Syntax and semantics in the history of Chinese World Wide Web [pdf], Japanese aru , iru , oru 'to be'.

Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 2 , Japanese aru , iru , oru 'to be' World Wide Web [pdf], Indo-European and Chinese: A comment on E. Pulleyblank's view. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics Dutch contributions to the 12th international congress of slavists: Linguistics , Rounded nasal vowels in the Freising Fragments. Who is who in the Old Prussian epigram? On the relative chronology of Celtic sound changes.

Lachmann's law again. Language change and typological variation: In honor of Winfred P. Lehmann on the occasion of his 83rd birthday , vol. The Old Prussian preterit. Toporov] Moskva: Indrik, , Annual of Armenian Linguistics 18 , De buren van onze voorouders. De talen van de wereld. Hypothese 14 september , 3. The language of the Old Prussian catechisms. Res Balticae 4 , Fortescue, Indo-European reflections Copenhagen: Reitzel, The rise and fall of glottalization in Baltic and Slavic. Linguistica Baltica 7 , Annual of Armenian Linguistics 19 , De grote taalatlas Haarlem: Schuyt, , Armenian glottalization revisited.

The origin of the Old English dialects revisited. Paragogic -e in the Old Prussian epigram. North-Western European Language Evolution 36 , Reflexes of Indo-European consonants in Albanian. Orpheus 8 , Double consonants in Old Prussian. Res Balticae 5 , An analysis of the Prussian First Catechism.

Ponto-Baltica , An Indo-European substratum in Slavic? Languages in prehistoric Europe Heidelberg: Winter, , Accent and ablaut in the Vedic verb. Accent and ablaut in the Vedic verb World Wide Web [pdf], Three notes on the Old Irish verb. Initial a- and e- in Old Prussian. Linguistica Baltica 8 , Proceedings of the second conference on Japanese linguistics and language teaching Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale, , Japanese wa , mo , ga , wo , na , no World Wide Web [pdf], Preaspiration or preglottalization?

The Armenian causative. Annual of Armenian Linguistics 20 ,